Threadripper vs threadripper pro reddit. 2nd gen threadripper is socket tr4.

Threadripper vs threadripper pro reddit If the motherboard is vertical to the ground, it'll disrupt the internal flow that is dependent on gravity, as the liquid inside the cooler would pool in the bottom half of the condenser. You could argue that the 3970X should be compared with the 7452, and you may be right The threadripper looks like the obvious winner, higher frequency, and option to overclock, the motherboards seem to have better 16x slot options and 10gbe built in. Bench the Threadripper against an i9 or something if you're into 3D rendering. But looking at CPU benchmarks , it looks like the EPYC processors outperform most Threadrippers while being cheaper - EPYC 9654 is retailing on Amazon for around $4K while the 5995WX is above $5K. So you can forget about it touching Zen 3 Threadripper Pros. The only benefit to the Epyc that i see is the ipmi. I'm a little miffed at my Microcenter because they don't keep the Thread Ripper CPUs near the 'standard' AMD chips, so I purchased this stuff since it was 'on the shelf'. Core count is one of AMD’s most significant selling points. Xeon (above) is a datacenter line of chips meant for AI applications and big data processing. Processor - AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3955WX, 3. This thread is archived benchmark to stretch even the Threadripper Pro If you want a processor for 3D rendering, make sure you're looking at benchmarks of Intel chips that were designed for that. So we have that the TR parts have better clock frequencies and more cache, at the cost of 100W more in TDP. He asked if threadripper pro is on the way. From those benchmarks, it looks like the difference in bandwidth improvement is a factor of 1. This is somewhat disappointing news for me as I have a unused BeQuiet Silent Loop 2 cooler with a Threadripper adapter bracket that I had intended to use with a Threadripper 5000 build and I was hoping I could use it for the 7000 series if I go in that direction instead. Of course, with 13900K, there's less PCIe lanes and lower max RAM. ) 7. Better boards at every price point, better IO and memory channels and RDIMM support (vs TRX40), etc. So it depends on what your work looks like, the best cpu could be a consumer gaming one from intel (primere pro tends to like both clock speed and gets a boost from the igpu) or the most cores you can afford on threadripper (rendering multiple scenes or via methods that scale well with more cores) CPU: ThreadRipper Pro 3975WX 5975WX Cooler: Thermalright Silver Arrow TR4 Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3 (way more silent) Motherboard: ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-Sage SE WIFI RAM: 256GB or 8 x Kingston Server Premier DIMM 32GB, DDR4-3200, CL22-22-22, ECC, KSM32ED8/32ME replaced with KSM32ED8/32HC 6. For Proxmox, I'm curious if you would feel comfortable running the same number of VMs on a 5950X that you would on a 32-core Threadripper. I explained that there is one released on Zen 2, that Zen 3 Threadripper hasn't been released yet and if AMD releases another pro version it could be at least 6 months after Zen 3 Threadripper comes out. AMD should call it Littleripper. Ryzen threadripper vs the ryzen 7 5700G . But if you're a professional, and need a workstation, TR PRO 3000 is what you need. U14S is good but the low RPM fans hit their ceiling pretty quickly. The new memory subsystem delivers up to 1. If you spend hours a day running highly multithreaded, CPU-bound applications for income/business use, then Threadripper might be a good idea. New threadripper will appear but that will move away from enthusiast/hpc to full on hpc with a price to match. I thought it was a pretty comprehensive answer tbh. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. It’s like a dump truck vs. 85 @ Amazon Deutschland CPU Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro TR4 59. You'll just be paying full Threadripper Pro prices for it, whatever they turn out to be. 00 @ Newegg Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts: Total: $8135. I would recommend the threadripper because of the 8-channel memory (vs. 9 GHz, 4. These processors have "numa nodes" which makes them act like two CPUs in one socket on a hardware level (very very simplified). EPYC doesn't have a chipset at all - all I/O comes directly from the CPU, and the socket is just called SP3. I've been deciding which route to go too (13900K+4090 vs Threadripper Pro 5955wx or above + 4090). I run a threadripper 3970x for my unreal development and was thinking of building a new rig recently to gain the higher clock speeds. I may not be able to find benchmarks for ANSYS myself, but whether single and multicore dependent you should have that performance in Threadripper 7000. 3gHz boost speed which makes the epyc more suitable for multithreaded server like running a mediacenter workloads and the threadripper more suitable for tasks that rely on cpu speed like gaming, editing and streaming. It also has lower base and boost clocks because it’s made for raw throughput on multithreaded workloads, and most games only use 6-12 threads still. I have most of the other components figured out, but can't decide if I should go with a "consumer" Ryzen 7950x or pay extra for a Threadripper Pro 5955WX (both have 16 cores). The problem with the higher-core Threadripper CPUs is that Windows assumes any CPU with more than about 18 or 20 cores is a multi-socket system and it plays hell with the scheduling. Each platform has it's pros and cons, but overzealous marketing by Apple is the issue here. Not 3D rendering. Am putting together my first build and I've come For Threadripper Pro, has there been any information about the socket and CPU upgrade path? My main concern is the upcoming release of Zen3 Threadrippers. That's why there's no reason to go above 16-cores on a Threadripper on Windows right now since this is limiting performance. 40 creator and a Threadripper 3960x with an Windows Server 2019 OS. I don't understand. Finally, and most obviously, Cores. At roughly 8x memory bandwidth, far more PCIe5 lanes etc etc. Power efficiency is my most important concern because these will be running 24/7 365 all cores maxed out. threadripper series comparison. Oct 23, 2020 · What is the difference between the AMD Ryzen Threadripper, Pro 3955WX, 16 Cores, 32 Threads, 4. However, dropping 4 grand on a CPU isn't wise unless if the stuff you're creating is actually making you enough money to justify the cost. The Threadripper Pro lineup was first introduced with the 3000 series, actually releasing a fair bit later than the standard Threadripper chips. 5 GHz sWRX8 Socket (100-100000446WOF) Or 7950X and RTX 4090 I will use these for machine learning Unless the application is programmed to consider these, it can result in a heavy performance penalty for very high core-count CPUs. Epyc is the server CPU which is currently up to 32 core 64 thread per cpu and 2 cpus can be dropped into a single server board. 5950X by comparison is at ~46,100. I have learned that it actually has 8 channel memory. Kinda torn between going Ryzen 7 1700x or 1800x vs going all out Threadripper 1950x. I realise, however, that there are some trade-offs. At the expense of loudness, you can replace them with higher RPM fans, like the Noctua 3000 rpm 14 cm model, or go even bigger to something like a Sanyo San-Ace, which will have an even higher RPM limit. Depends. The Pro boards are larger than the non-Pro boards, so I limited my choices to cases that officially supported the SSI-EEB form factor. The best CPU for you (assuming you don’t need a lot of IO) is the R9 I was probably going to go with AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which has passmark of ~63,200. Gaming its a dead horse. The Threadripper 7000 series, designed for the High-End Desktop (HEDT) market, supports the TRX50 chipset, while the Threadripper PRO 7000WX series steps it up with the WRX90 chipset. Most importantly, it's unclear to me if I can squeeze 512GB of RAM into a single Threadripper node. Epyc vs threadripper pro I am planning to build a workstation for my research lab and trying to decide between epyc 9374f and threadripper 7975wx. Agreed. Essentially you'd have everything the same with the 1800X except the RAM would be in Quad Channel mode as well as the GPUs be running at full bore x16/x16 mode. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Threadripper. 99 @ Amazon Deutschland Memory I'm not looking for gaming anecdotes. 8gHz boost and the epyc has a 2. This is a comparison of the top end x series vs the top end threadripper cpus. You only need like $3000 to max out the RAM with a threadripper while a mac pro could take $18000 worth of memory sticks. Been looking at a threadripper 3960x on an ASRock creator board with good amount of ram. Some of the stuff that is really expensive in the $50k mac pro you cannot get for a threadripper. Jun 29, 2024 · At the heart of the distinction between Threadripper and Threadripper PRO lies their platform capabilities. 5GHz from what i am reading you are trying to run an ERP software with a cheaper Threadripper-built system? somehow i totally get your dilemma especially when it revolving around budgets. 0. It might be fixed sometime in the future. Even if one speculates 30% higher prices for newgen TR PRO boards, they would still be in that price range. Thanks, this was helpful. Also WRX80 boards are in that price bracket. In this benchmark the 20 Core M1 Ultra is slower than the 16 core 5950X and a 2019 24 Core 3960X Threadripper. 96 cores was already a big surprise, I thought TRX Pro was going to be Siena 8-channel with 64 core maximum. I want to build a ml workstation with 2x rtx4090 and 128GB RAM. AMD really left a gaping hole between the 3950X and 3960X when they basically said, "if you want Threadripper features, pony up for the 24 core". Threadripper 3990x vs Epyc 7763 Power Efficiency? I have a workload requiring a high thread count but single threaded performance is also important (Cinema 4D CPU-based 3D renders). Dual CPU Systems actually aren't that bad anymore because of the popularity of AMDs Threadripper lineup. The 64-core 7985WX is a closer match-up to the Intel 56-core w9-3495X, and here, the Threadripper PRO scores 72% higher. But it still handles all my games and work fine. Zen 3 has about 20-30% better gaming performance, as well as substantial improvements in workstation tasks. So there must be some existing means for getting these students the resources they need outside of each one dishing out $5K on a computer. It's not realistic to expect every grad student to be able to afford their own Xeon-W or Threadripper Pro rig. Scaling with more cores is never linear, but this is a bit lower than we’d hope for. I think that the price of the 3970X is justified, given that is probably a worse silicon quality and the 100W increase in TDP. There is the workstation class Threadripper pro 5000 but that's really not in the same price tier of what X399 once offered. Guess I'll have to look into a non-Threadripper build now as I'm reallllly wanting to build a new system. (I've seen people successfully squeeze the WRX90 into a smaller case, but I didn't want to risk things being too cramped inside the case. 70 @ Mindfactory Motherboard: ASRock X399 Phantom Gaming 6 ATX sTR4 Motherboard: €249. Performance wise, if the clock speed is as high as I think then it will be faster than the 32 core Threadripper but the performance per dollar will be firmly held by Threadripper. With the intel system able to use all the DDR4 ram at once vs the TRX40 2 lane memory the encode was well over 25% percent faster and compression seems to be more accurate on the Intel machine with the set target size. while there's a lot of Youtubers out there praising the performance of Threadripper, one thing for sure it is not a server grade component. Even in multithreaded workloads, CPU Benchmark shows the Ryzen 7 3700X as roughly equivalent to the Threadripper 1920X despite having 4 fewer cores (8 cores vs 12). Almost 4x the cores while being 4x the price, and unlike the 10980XE, the CPU actually exists. Single threaded performance will be about 25% higher on 13900K, and multi-core is nearly 40K, which is lower than TR Pro but not bad at all for the money. Share Add a Comment Sort by: View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Even existing WRX80 boards have plenty more bandwith at the same price level. The memory and pci expansion makes this an excellent platform for future growth. Intel differentiate by calling them Xeon W, AMD went with Threadripper Pro. I currently have a Threadripper PRO 5955WX so I thought it might make sense to upgrade it to a 5995WX seeing as it's the same socket. Threadripper fits between the ryzen lineup (standard desktop) and the server systems. AMD has Threadripper PRO, and Threadripper HEDT this round should be 2 different IO dies as one supports 64 PCIe Lanes and The other has like 128 lanes maybe less do to Chipset waiting for details I think it was the same as Epyc for PRO it also has 2 different Sockets as well. In my case the memory bandwidth and pcie 4. I was originally fixated on epyc because it will allow dual socket config and can add a new cpu later, but prebuilds are super expensive and cpu alone is not available anywhere. 99 @ Amazon Storage First of all, it's not even close. 5GHz Boost Clocks: 28 Cores Loaded: 3. I'm sitting at 20 GB/s on my Xeon quad channel, so 90GB/s would be a massive upgrade. I personally see no pro to the i9 over the threadripper. They also usually don't care about the cost, a lot of the time the hardware pays for itself later. Given the number of available lanes and intended target audience for Threadripper and Threadripper Pro, it's always struck me as a bit of an odd restriction. Certainly, most deployments at that level would be operating through a filesystem/software managed array, but it seems like a silly thing to restrict. AMD - Threadripper 1950X 3. 6 GHz Socket sWRX8 280W Desktop Processor - 100-100000445WOF: $3299. My budget is 4K and they start at $4,100 or something like that I think. Registered ECC RAM support - Threadripper and Ryzen PRO only support unbuffered ECC (which also limits you to 2 slots per channel, or 8 DIMMs on TR). 8 GHz Upto 4. There are still some engineering decisions you can take for a workstation vs data center machine, so you can end with with slightly different CPUs from the same SKU stack. 2nd gen threadripper is socket tr4. MacBook pro 2,2 not Unfortunately we are in a bit of a grey area at the moment as most of the new Ryzen 7000 motherboards (and content) are geared towards gaming, Threadripper Desktop looks to be discontinued and the Threadripper Pro will likely be updated next year or the following. I have a few questions: I read that the Intel Xeon series is more reliable than the AMD TR/EPYC processors. The next-generation workstation flagship represents a 50% increase in core count over the existing Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX (Chagall). What is your opinion on the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs. " The Geekbench 5 submission (via Benchleaks) exposes the Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7995WX with 96 cores and 192 threads. 1 being a windows server, 2 windows 11 pro VM's both with passthrough video cards to use as desktops, 1 Linux server, and 1 Mac VM with passthrough video. I've been wanting to build a dedicated streaming PC but I won a threadripper 1900 from a raffle, but I don't have a threadripper motherboard so my question is would a single PC with that THREADRIPPER, AN OC 1070 TI, AND 16GB OF 3000MHZ RAM be a better option than a My general advice would be if you're debating whether you need a Threadripper, you probably don't. Threadripper is a CPU for highly multithreaded workloads. Let’s compare these CPUs in terms of core count, cache memory, RAM support, and price. r/DataHoarder • Just found out that the company where I work have many 60TB SSD units. The Threadripper Pro chips+motherboard is probably going to be beyond my price range. 96 @ Amazon CPU Cooler: be quiet! - Dark Rock Pro TR4 59. The Intel machine using Win 11 Pro and the Threadripper using Win 11. 0 lanes for rendering support; where AM4 will only run 1 GPU at the full 16x lanes, or two GPU's at 8x lanes each. Looking for some opinions, I know its the internet and all, I am building a home server [file storage, plex, security cameras, VM projects/experiments]. 64MB for the Threadripper. Threadripper PRO: What’s the Difference? the standard Threadripper offers ample compute power to be an excellent choice for multiple workflows Apr 21, 2024 · Threadripper Vs Threadripper Pro Vs Epyc Processors. I will be using the system for video editing – mostly 4k 10 bit footage with plenty of special effects. Third, the 2950X is on a dead platform. If additional details on the types of renders, etc are needed to help make recommendation let me know. So if you liked threadripper for your workstation then please share your experience. 8 GHz 8-Core Processor: €147. As Threadripper PRO are based on Epyc, their socket refresh cycle will likely match the Epyc socket cycle. Get as many channels of dram as you can. but for software that does requires (uses fully) a ton of cores threadripper might/will probably be a lot better due to its cost, but still both need to be tested for any meaningfull arguements to be made. Everything is a trade off with noise. Then why not then just wait for threadripper pro 7000? People and companies who use computers for work buy hardware which meets their needs and get the work done the fastest. Also want to have 5 VM's running 24/7. I mean both have the same cores and Nov 27, 2023 · Threadripper vs. Both Threadripper product lines use the same sTR5 socket, which is physically the same as SP6. Hey everyone I recently ordered a new PC mostly for gaming, and there was a deal on the Threadripper 1950x only making the build $200 more then a build with the Ryzen 7 2700x, I read through many benchmarks, and it looks like the Threadripper 1950x could be a bottleneck. It seems HEDT was abandoned for the past two years now. a Lamborghini. With threadripper you have 5 times the number of PCIE lanes meaning lots of GPU, multigig networking and storage capabilities. More efficient CPU, higher clocks, newer platform that also may see Zen 5 support. On a genetic algorithm task, the Threadripper build completes the training workflow in just over 52% of the time of the n1-highcpu-64. So, I was thinking of either getting a dual EPYC motherboard and putting 2x older epyc processors there (like EPYC "Rome" 7402, 24C, 2. I suspect Spec doesn't account for such a high L3 cache and you are getting a significant benefit from this aspect. This drive is much better than the Firecuda 520, and Sabrent Rocket 4. Threadripper makes no sense for anyone anymore except for like, HFT traders that will pay infinite dollars for maximum clocks. 35GHz boost), or a single Threadripper PRO processor, like 3955WX (16C, 3. So, in effect, there will already be a 96-core Threadripper part. Less features to it as a result. 795 subscribers in the threadripper community. Either way I'll be using 64gb of RAM. All products can be used with the TRX50 chipset. What are you measuring on the Epyc? Hint: 256MB of l3 cache on the Epyc vs. Currently do too much video editing that benefits from the 5900x The reason is because the motherboards for those chips are expensive, Ryzen 3000 (3950x) is so much better than 2nd gen Threadripper, and 3rd gen Threadripper is so much better still. Threadripper also supports 4 GPU's @ 16 pcie 4. The Elite will work with the Threadripper Pro, but it will only function if the motherboard is horizontal to the ground. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X? I feel like the 7960x is superior in every aspect, unless i would want to expand my setup in the future to quad gpu or more RAM. , so why does AMD still have pins on the Ryzen CPU's, when obviously the other system used on threadrippers is way better, with no chance of pin issues. CPU PCIe lanes: 128 on Threadripper vs 24 on Ryzen. AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro Series Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5965WX Desktop Processor 24 cores 48 Threads 150 MB Cache 3. I doubt it will be as fast on singlethreaded work as a 7800x3d at this point. Even then the top end xeon W 2000 series chip(a step up of the x series on the same socket, but different chipset) is a $1300 cpu which is in competition with the lowest current threadripper at $1400 for similar performance to the I9. DDR5-5200 is now supported, up from a maximum rated DDR4-3200 clock for older Threadripper systems. If you're planning on searching for Threadripper Pro motherboards, however, knowing the sWRX8 name probably won't help you with navigating on vendor pages. I'm planning to replace my aging, but still glorious, PC until the end of the year. Hi, my knowledge on CPU performance is very limited so this might be a dumb question (all I know is the TR is fast AF lol). Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen3, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. The Intel Xeon w3-2423 and could be coupled with the unreleased ASRock SPC741D8UD-2T X550 or some other mATX board that releases soon. . I was hoping that this launch would help fill that gap. Either Siena 8-channel can still go up to 96 cores after all, or TRX is made with IO dies that failed to validate on all 12 memory channels? Hi guys, I see no online reseller listing the Threadripper PRO 7955WX for sale, I suspect this is a OEM only cpu, any one has confirmation ? or have managed to get one ? Threadripper 3960X + Gigabyte Aorus Master TRX40 for $1,900 or Threadripper Pro 3955WX + Asus Pro WS WRX80E for $2,175 In this use case the extra (8) cores of the 3960X should outweigh the (4) extra memory channels of the 3955WX right? Going Threadripper is quite a bit more ($3299 for a Threadripper PRO 5975WX on Newegg) so it would need to be a big improvement to justify a cost like that internally. Only Pro products can be used with WRX90. The first Epyc socket lasted from Zen1 to Zen3. ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI sWRX8 Extended ATX AMD Motherboard: $999. Idk how to directly respond to your comment about the threadripper pro suggestion, but the new threadripper pro series only comes on the llenovo thinkstation computers which, being pre built, are priced higher than I can afford. The more interesting comparison is with the 64-core Threadripper Pro 7985WX. 3Ghz and the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, 16 Core, 32 Threads, 4. And, in fact, this is true not only for the new Threadipper 7980X 64-core, but the previous generation Threadripper PRO 5995WX, as well as the Intel Xeon w9-3475X 35-core and w9-3495X 56-core. I have a threadripper from first generation in my desktop (1920x) With its slow clock there are many faster out now. probably the same of ryzens vs kaby lakes. Apparently an overclocked 16-core Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms a 32-core Threadripper on multi-core benchmarks (link posted below). ThreadRipper 3970x vs Current Gen AMD/Intel CPUs Is it worth buying an old threadripper over current AMD or Intel CPUs? I'm comparing the threadripper to Ryzen 5 5600x and Intel 13th Gen i5 and it seems that the latest cpus give better, if not equivalent performance in most of the areas. It also ports 60% more cores than Intel's Xeon Platinum 8490H (Sapphire Rapids) server chip. Threadripper vs M1. The new i9 14th gen has just came out and the i9 13900k price dropped a bit as well as the higher clockspeed Ryzen 9 79503dx, both these chips come with less cores than my threadripper but the cores run much higher. So a delta of 8 1080p streams (31-23) with a cost delta of $1950 (TR $2700 to Ryzen9 at $750). It would be interesting to see a Ryzen 1800X vs a Game Mode ThreadRipper 1950X with the same clock speeds. 85GHz multi-core, 3. WRX80 MobBos. Reasons #1 and #3 are even more amply addressed by Threadripper Pro, which has more I/O (128 PCIe lanes instead of 64), double the memory channels (8 versus 4), and much higher memory capacity due to support for registered DIMM's (2TB rather than 256GB possible). Threadripper has a lot of cores and CCDs which increases core to core latency. You are buying an expensive motherboard with no support for Threadripper 3rd or 4th gen. I have purchased everything but the cooler which is what this post is about, here is the build for a DS/ML beast box which might have a dual boot with stress relief on the off chance its not heating my home: Problem is Threadripper PRO is still based on Zen 2. The only real downside is that the platform is not future proof. Mostly interested in how was the transition to OR FROM threadripper. While the 7995WX has 50% more cores, it is only 27% faster. I‘m struggling to decide on the right cpu. Here are the turbo modes for the Platinum 8180 (28 Core XEON): Base Clock: 2. Threadripper owners have been screwed on sockets soooo many times. The problem right now is that EPYC isn't really available yet, so we can mostly speculate on the exact capabilities. 72 TL;DR: the Threadripper (24 cores, 48 threads) completes a 1000 epoch training run with proximal policy optimization in about 63% of the time taken by the cloud instance. Assuming you are comparing a low end thread ripper with a high end ryzen where the core count are similar, the main advantages of threadripper are the number of PCIE lanes and the total amount of ram you can have. ) My question is, should I go with an HP z4 or z6 xeon machine, or is getting a threadripper pc with higher specs better? I've heard good things about the solid build of the HP z workstations, but I'm wondering if they're worth the premium price tag, since I can get a higher core count/speed with a threadripper for the same price as a lower core Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. AMD Introduces New AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7000 Series Processors and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7000 WX-Series Processors for the Ultimate Workstation amd comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment I recently purchased a Threadripper pro processor (3955wx)with 16 core/32 threads. AMD Threadripper 1900X 3. More cores generally mean better performance, making AMD processors easily marketable. However, if you are deadset on a cpu, get the threadripper, and do not be cheap on the ram, during the training, and even inference, the neural networks will not fit in the cache so your cpu will spend a lot of time talking to dram. 2), 2TiB maximum ram capacity (vs 128GB), 120 Pcie lanes (20), larger cache and a more uniform architecture that benefits this type of workload. I imagine there will then be a Zen3 Threadripper Pro in a couple quarters or a year from now. They've had two generations on the initial sWRX8 socket but as the Zen4 Epycs had a new socket, it seems inevitable that Zen4 TR PRO will too. Threadripper Pro uses WRX80, and the socket is called sWRX8. I'll be gaming with the new RTX 2080ti Nvidia card, on a 4k 60FPS monitor. Maximum supported memory, 256 GB on a Threadripper or 2 TB on a Threadripper Pro vs 128 GB on a Ryzen. Ryzen has plenty for almost all regular desktop use cases (16 lanes for the GPU, 4 for the main NVMe drive, and 4 to talk to the chipset which can provide additional chipset lanes and SATA Hard to tell as it depends on what codecs, bitrates and bit depths you'd be using. This video is more so for people who are on the 1st gen threadripper Zen or Zen+ (x399) and are considering their options for an upgrade path. Threadripper is the HPED/HEDT solution directly competing with intel's own HPED/HEDT x99 or x299 solutions. yes it will run fine I myself can't wait to build a 7800x3d machine some point in the next year or so, right now at a 5900x its hard to justify taking the whole thing apart for a 5800x3d, 8 cores at 4500 vs 12 cores at 4900-5000ish, with the only big difference is 64 vs 96 mb of L3. Hey, The main big difference between an epyc cpu and a threadripper is that the threadripper has a 3. Do I go with the older 1st generation Threadripper 1950X or the brand new, yet to be released, Intel Xeon w3-2423? The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X would be coupled with the ASRock X399M Taichi . I like the case, but it's pretty big. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. 42 (details below). For those unaware of the difference between the Pro and standard 3rd gen Threadripper here's a quick run down: Pro is slower than its regular counterpart with lower standard clockspeeds and locked multipliers 8 channel memory support over the quad channel of regular Threadripper Can support up to 2 TB of RAM over the 256GB limit of standard Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. And, I'll add, I'm not looking for specific model advice, I'm looking for a general i9 vs. The brute force of the 3970X shouldn't be under estimated, but at the same time programs like Premiere Pro and many codecs love high IPC, especially if you can't use the GPU for decoding the video. Ryzen threadripper vs ryzen , why are the pins still there on Ryzens? Discussion CPU's with pins can run into issues with bent pins, broken pins, etc. 83 vs a price difference of ~1. 3GHz boost), or perhaps an older TR4 socket threadripper. (Cache and memory benchmark) I've finally got my hands on the new ASUS WRX90 motherboards, paired with the beastly Threadripper Pro 7965WX to keep things cool, I went with a cooler from TT and 2 fans for the ram, safter reading some reviews, I decided to go with v-color OC RDIMM 8x32GB kit 7200, and manually overclocked it to 7600 CL36 without AMD Introduces New AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7000 Series Processors and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7000 WX-Series Processors for the Ultimate Workstation r/Amd Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. 9GHz, 64 MB, BOX (100-100000167WOF) Graphic Card - PNY Quadro RTX A4000 16GB GDDR6 (VCNRTXA4000-PB) Motherboard- Gigabyte B550M AORUS PRO- Hardware What are your opinions on Epyc vs Threadripper? Looking at pure total frequency capacity, Threadrippers are in the lead because of higher clocks (and are cheaper to boot). 9 GHz. If there's a non-pro TRX then it will probably work off of Siena server parts. The 5950X is far more powerful than the 2950X (Zen 3 vs Zen+). Threadripper doesn't have a 2 core per CCD configuration, so you really can't compare them. Ryzen ThreadRipper PRO 3955WX vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X I just purchased a Ryzen 3950x, 64GB DDR4 3200, and RX 6700 XT, and an ASRock X570 Tachi motherboard. It is more expensive when you account for the cost of the motherboard. higher ipc, higher clocks which fares better on software that doesnt require many extra cores. If you are going to run more than 2 GPU's, or you need 2 GPU's with the full 16 pcie lanes, you need Threadripper. Video recording devices, nvme ssd drives, gpus etc. My Intel system from 2011 has been struggling with video editing and was really hoping to get the new Threadripper which I've been waiting for for a year. The Threadripper 3990X is better by far. But in my opinion I would always recommend Threadripper or Threadripper Pro. Threadripper Cooler Options (AIO vs beQuiet/Arctic) If this post works I can finally post again u/StariusPrime , here is hoping. I can't wait until next year to see if AMD decides to release Zen 4 Threadrippers. I had all of them in the above threadripper system and am waiting for the Samsung 2TB (dad the 1TB version in the above. Otherwise, you'll probably be fine with the 5950X. The new 3rd generation of Threadripper chips fix the many issues that had previously made Threadripper a difficult recommendation and a middling solution on Windows. I was interested in this launch mostly for the prospects of a 12 core and 16 core Threadripper. The multithread thing is what you want to focus on, because if single/quad speed was what you cared about, then the 8700K would be a better choice than either. If I were to purchase a Ryzen 9 5950X would I expect to get similar performance? So now they just have Ryzen and Epyc, with Threadripper Pro being relabelled Epyc CPUs. 63x more bandwidth per core, giving the new chips more legroom and improving scaling. If you want to put together a workstation, you should look at the Threadripper Pro lineup instead. 0 would be a major benefit. If you didn't like threadripper for your workstation and switched back to intel please, even more so, share your experience. I'm considering getting a threadripper 2990wx/3960x based workstation for my research lab's simulation needs (so please don't factor in gaming performance) . Hey! Figured I'd pose a tech question not related to the LMG drama. For gaming this isn't useful. Threadripper 7000 makes some significant changes to its memory subsystem compared to Threadripper 3000. The 7900x has a 15ish% advantage in single/quad thread processes, but the 1950x has a 40% advantage in multithreaded workloads. 2GHz 24 Cores Loaded: 3. The 2000 series models are going for less than $200, and a tray of 4 is being sold for around $500! Threadripper 1950x performance vs Ryzen 9 5950X I currently mine randomX on 6 Threadripper 1950x's, and they only consume about 50% of the cpu at most. ) I'm planning on using a Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB for the NVMe drive on the CPU losts of IOPs on the boot drive. If you need extra PCIe lanes, then the Threadripper line is a good option, but for pure CPU performance per dollar, the mainstream Ryzens are probably the best right now. TR Pro 7000 Pro/Con: Pro: higher single thread clock speed Con: 8 channels DDR5 is less than 12 channels DDR5 At the moment, I am not sure: if TR Pro will have RDIMM support if TR Pro will ever have 16 DIMM slot boards if TR Pro will allow memory OC. 99 @ Newegg Custom: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - Ryzen Threadripper PRO Chagall PRO (Zen 3) 32-Core 3. Threadripper having 4 lanes of ram has twice the memory bandwidth to play with and a lot more pci lanes for high data rate computer peripherals. I'd just be concerned about TR PRO 5000 coming out like a month after I built a 3000 system I see a lot of these cheap Ryzen Threadrippers on sale on eBay (simply searching "Ryzen Threadripper" on eBay will show you what I mean), and obviously there's a huge price discrepancy between buying one on Amazon vs eBay. I've come to acquire an old build with a 3970X threadripper 32 core and 128GB ddr4 ram at 2400mhz, l haven't found much info around gaming outside of games from 2019/2020. 5 CFM CPU Cooler: €77. 3GHz 20 Cores Loaded: 3. /r/AMD is community run and does not represent AMD in any capacity unless specified. 5 CFM CPU Cooler - Motherboard: MSI - X399 SLI PLUS ATX TR4 Motherboard - Memory: Corsair - Vengeance LPX 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3200 Memory: $214. Everyone else should just buy an Epyc. Threadripper all the way. Second, the 2950X is not any cheaper. Note that the 7502P is priced at $2300, while the 3970X is priced at $1999. Sep 9, 2022 · As mentioned before, regular Threadripper chips aren't exactly geared towards workstations. 4 GHz 16-Core Processor: $586. When threadripper came out I was convinced I would be a threadripper class processor owner for the next decade at least, but the sockets changed so often that they converted me to consumer AMD platform rather than prosumer and I'll eat the pcie and ram channel penalty. Threadripper/Pro has plenty more. uvevrmj fytcdqh rkl hmjrsmg pdfanhq chtv pjt otr rhemf tpgid