Xfce vs lxde reddit. Lubuntu, Xubuntu, Linux Lite, or Tiny Core.

1 that ended up leading to 67% greater memory consumption than LXDE. AskLinux: Xfce vs GNOME. But there are several reasons for it to use xfce in first place. I'm now using xfce over lxde. In my experience, XFCE still uses fewer ressources than KDE. Cualquier lector podrá enviar contenido sobre el tema que nos interesa, GNU/Linux y cultura libre… It could make a big difference, or it could not. Which distro will work faster for me? I'm on the Fedora Xfce right now. Try them out! If you have the spare USB drives, try both. Xfce is one stable piece. Also, it's a lot easier and smarter to install an Ubuntu version that comes with the according DE by default KDE is Now Lighter than XFCE. Edit: Both are pretty ugly out of the box in most distros so you'll have to invest some time on both of them. Personally I'd go with mint xfce. No dconf or gconf editors needed. Whatever the RAM usage, XFCE for me is unusable. Let’s have a look at the Mint variants one by one. Cinnamon, because of its monolithic structure, is by far less customizable. • 6 yr. I used both distributions. Now if I use my laptop for an extended period of time I have to reboot because Xorg's memory consumption increases with time (starts with 1% and goes up to 14%). Xfce should be better. I personally love KDE, it’s pretty and very usable and looks modern. css. Depending on what you mean by "desktop environment" you might include simple window managers that use less. Honestly a lot of DEs are approaching about the same place weight wise. So, personally, I would install Xubuntu. My suggestion is to go with xfce - it is the one I like the most in the three because it is highly configurable. I am currently running linux mint cinnamon. MATE: 465 MB Memory used. It's Debian-based, uses a custom IceWM-based desktop, and sysv init instead of systemd, both of which will save a considerable amount of RAM over LXDE. See full list on maketecheasier. If your PC is powerful enough, try KDE. r/linux4noobs A chip A chip My personal favorite is Budgie. LXDE started being ported to GTK3, but the extra weight was noticed & is blogged out by LXDE devs; and a new Qt5 port was made; in comparison it was much lighter; thus the GTK3 port was abandoned, and devs from LXDE joined with UglierThanMoe. LXDE looks more basic compared to Xfce. But, my impression has been that LXDE is the lighter of the two. But we all have that itch that pushes you Open the ~/. Depends on your usage, and when it decides to go nuts on a large amount of files. Download and install ventoy to a stick, copy isos for the distros you want to look at to it and boot. XFCE I found frustrating re: panel. Jan 14, 2019 · KDE is an alternative lighter weight desktop environment to Ubuntu's default interface. Should be fine, though it will take more work to get up (Less than gentoo). I've been considering switching environments when the next Mint version comes out. My choice is Mate desktop environment but LXDE or i3wm also go fine. My friend first helped me install Arch, I installed gnome and there was an issue with it, so we decided to switch me over to KDE. Out of curiousity I installed XFCE and Trinity last days (additional to Gnome2 and KDE4). Now, your XFCE4 panel and Whisker menu should have a customized appearance based on your modifications CSS. It's still lighter than many other DEs, but it's not a real lightweight anymore. Cold boot 1: After cold boot, I opened the application menu to make the icons loaded. Xubuntu is a distro that also uses XFCE. LXDE (gtk2 version) was snappier than XFCE but XFCE is more polished and requires no workarounds that LXDE required (stuff like screen locking and compositing). nextgensparx. Award. Mate was nice looking, but, at least on Ubuntu Mate, it was pretty buggy. Yes I could do the same with LXDE, but I find the sound support within the gui for GNOME is easier to work with. Simple and fast. EDIT: Thanks to everyone who had answered. I recently put one of my PC'S on KDE Neon Plasma and it's pretty slick, works great and looks great. I think LXQT is a little more responsive, but the difference is almost negligible. XFCE is also an incredibly popular Desktop Environment. XFCE used to be very lightweight, but it has become less and less so in the last years. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. I'm running Lubuntu LXQt right now with 6 Chromium tabs open and my memory useage is right now at 1. It is excellent. Mediocre_Field_1661. Had to install pulseaudio separately to get audio in steam games to work, but aside from that, the performance is significantly better in newer games with much lower usage of resources. 10 on a 3 year old laptop with only 1 GB of RAM. Some individuals in various forums have made the claim that LXDE is more “modular”, and therefore easier to develop for than XFCE. The dozens of other WMs are there because people prefer different functionality and configuration. Ubuntu: 153,840 KB. 18. Sep 23, 2012 · I used LXDE a little more than a year and switched to XFCE. Community releases include Awesome, bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, i3, LXDE, LXQT, Mate Sep 19, 2021 · Xfce vs MATE. Xfce makes use of lesser resources, but its benefits come to light when you will be download and run the apps which depend on GNOME. Search the web for Xfce customization: it's plenty of tutorials. Esto obviamente depende de la implementación, pero para los dos en cuestión aquí, XFCE se lleva la victoria en facilidad de uso. They mainly vary in style, but also in how lightweight vs. resolutions etc. 1 had a 24% smaller memory footprint than KDE 4. Creeping on dinosaur years buddy. Day to day I mostly use MATE. LXDE is a desktop environment which uses the Openbox window manger as well as other applications like PCMan for the file manager and others for the panel etc. That said, I personally can't stand Thunar, xfce's default file manager. It is a good start for learning linux, storage of configuration, tunning of Light environment. Try both out and see which you like. Oct 4, 2016 · In fact, LXQt 0. TLDR : Customize and make things yours before judging them. • 3 mo. 270MB difference isn't much. Cold boot 2: same as 1, but it’s tested after We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. No hitting the start button to search for programs, just barely configurable, built on a suite of mostly primitive applications (Dolphin and Kate blow them all out of the water), etc. 1 subscriber in the LinuxFans community. The first test is simply to check how much memory is used after a fresh boot of the respective live CDs, all the way into the default desktop. Edit 3 months later: After using Linux Mint Cinnamon for nearly a year, I just wanted a little bit more ability to customize. Processor Speed 1. paulgrey506. I won't deny I just… I have used both Linux Mint 18 XFCE and Lubuntu 18. Using deepin DE myself it's been so solid that I haven't distro-hopped for awhile. 60 GHz. But if you want Xfce, MX is the choice I would recommend because they concentrate on Xfce as their flagship. A rolling release distro featuring a user-friendly installer, tested updates and a community of friendly users for support. Official releases include Xfce, KDE, Gnome, and the minimal CLI-Installer Architect. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. Older laptops with 2 or 4 GB RAM need to Feb 1, 2024 · Feb 1, 2024. Reply. It’s clear here that Lubuntu is the outright winner using almost two thirds less memory than the others. It’s my choice. 29. Will continuing using LXDE on 20. 04 be problematic? How exactly can I use LXDE on 20. Gnome 3 makes my computer run really hot. Using an Arch install recently I went with, you guessed it xfce. I guess the minimal version doesn't have all the drivers, no matter what people might claim on forums. KDE can be alright if you configure it right (disable file indexer, don't use krunner, make sure it uses your GPU when doing compositing tasks etc. KDE randomly crashes on every computer I have used it on. They are close enough that you can just pick the one whose look & feel you like more and go enjoy it! 1. It should be noted that Openbox is actually a window manager and must be used in conjunction with one of the desktop environments listed above. I also use Openbox on rare occasions when I want as lean as possible while still handling multiple possibly overlapping windows. Mate is always my choice due to light memory reqs and hi speed. But in the long term, they will be more different. But because of the rise of the new desktop environments, the current situation of XFCE is actually a bit awkward. Xubuntu: 156,852 KB. 10 (lxqt) on an old Dell netbook. com We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. MATE is also a good choice. Xfce is a fast, stable, and a highly customizable lightweight Linux desktop environment. For KDE, idle at 670-750MB For Gnome, idle at 900+MB For Xfce, idle around 420+MB For Lxde, idle around 350-400MB For open box, idle around 350-370MB For Enlightenment, idle around 300MB. I keep LXDE around when I want something a bit lighter and/or want to futz with its pure text file config. 0-1 amd64 Typelib file for libxfce4ui. This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. LXDE is the lightest without going completely plain with just a window manager (which I chose to do) KDE, though I'd recommend lxde/lxqt for the best battery life. • 10 yr. I can’t remember values for Mate. Because of this, XFCE makes for a good desktop environment for older hardware that has less powerful CPUs, Video horsepower, and less memory. ), but even then it usually still uses more RAM than XFCE does out of the box. I've evaluated all the ups and downs and decided to settle with LXQT for now. I like em both but use xfce. Lubuntu: 57,908 KB. I then tried installing Manjaro full KDE and it worked perfectly. XFCE seems more mature and has more features which often are available as separate packages. Simply , I'm moving from Arch to Debian and I prefer XFCE but I couldn't choose which distro to install. I would go lxde until the next stable Debian release. afaik LXDE is the least RAM-consuming of your options, especially if you don't use any applications besides vm-software. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. XFCE and LXDE are both popular desktop choices. Este es un gran problema para aquellos usuarios con RAM muy limitada. 2. FWLIW, there's also LXDE, which can use fewer system resources than xfce on some systems. Las aplicaciones se desarrollaron específicamente para XFCE, mientras que LXDE se basa en muchas aplicaciones de otros DE. MATE comes with more features than Xfce. 04, then install LXDE sudo apt install lxde , and then how to run LXDE instead of LXQT? Oct 29, 2020 · LXDE and XFCE are two of the top Linux desktop environments out there, between them offering sleek UIs, customizability and the kind of desktop elegance that IMO LXDE while lighter on resources never had the same level of integration and polish that XFCE had. XFCE is going towards GTK3 while LXDE is going towards QT. However, both Fedora and Ubuntu also have spins/derivatives that are based on other desktops, Xubuntu (XFCE) or Fedora's KDE Spin. I never tried Mate on Manjaro, but used it on Ubuntu Mate, then switched to Manjaro Xfce. I have tried gnome, kde, xfce, lxde, lxqt, mate before arriving on linux mint cinnamon. FLUFF. For now, though, I think both are still using GTK2. There's also Proxmox, a Debian-based distro that focuses on being a VM host. Maybe I'm missing something… 46 votes, 23 comments. AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs. XFCE is lighter, a little less customizable. XFCE is stable as bedrock. I do find LXDE personally to be a tad lighter on dependencies, and I use things like lxappearance in my non-LXDE installs. This is what dpkg -l "*libxfce*" is showing right now on my system. Selecting among these two is very difficult. Purely from the theoretical aspect, I do think that LXDE is (still) faster. Mint Vera Xfce on netbook with Intel Atom N455 RAM 2Gb, it works decently. Your choice. Then removed XFCE again - and already wondered why it wanted to de-install so much. I think the only top distributions that have GNOME as the default right now are Fedora and Ubuntu. But again, I switched to something else (Openbox, which is the window manager used in 2. (yes there are more minimal desktops than lxde but openbox, etc lack the features that lxde/xfce has) Also e17 is very very fast. After cold boot, LXQt uses 112 MB in the testing environment. LXDE/LXQT is lightweight and easy to use, AFAIK AwesomeWM is even lighter but requires some configuration for intuitiveness (I know Lua so i could preconfigure it for him). LXDE is definitely the lighter one. 4. heavy. Each one has it's own fans that will praise one and reject others. Last. Xfce is highly customizable, and users can easily modify the appearance and behavior of the desktop View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Xfce vs. All the backends/libraries are 4. Enlightenment E17. config/gtk-3. Gnome and KDE. KDE on Manjaro is buggy. So far, it's been great. Xfce, is however, slightly more mature and is a little more advanced. GNOME 2. I am running Ubuntu 9. 04? First install Lubuntu 20. 0/gtk. There is no better, just different. When I started I was happily running mint cinnamon (LM17 at the time) on a T410 with 4GB RAM. LXDE transitioned from GTK to Qt almost a decade ago. Xfce vs LXDE vs TDE (Trinity) vs KDE vs MATE vs Lumina vs Equinox vs LXQt vs Gentoo Linux vs Void Linux vs Arch vs PCLinuxOS vs Debian. KDE is more customizable, but heavier. The memory footprint difference between LXDE and LXQt for me is around 200MB, which in effect meant the system takes up 600MB instead of 400MB. 3M subscribers in the linux community. LXDE. I like kde for customization. Apr 25, 2017 · LXDE was once my favorite, but don't use anymore. I like gnome for productivity. In the beginning it used the XForms toolkit to program the GUI Jun 30, 2014 · Holy wars could be waged over XFCE vs LXDE vs MATE vs Openbox. Updated. compositor) chosen or designed to give a consistent experience. while the distros that use LXDE as the default desktop include Lubuntu and so on. They're both pretty light. Menu items disappearing and twitching that kinda thing. Unity vs. LXQT vs LXDE (Linux Mint) Discussion. com I recently saw a thread here on r/crouton about using LXDE over XFCE and thought I may as well give it a try on my i3 C720. 18 in sid. 304K subscribers in the linuxmasterrace community. . 2 but still useful. Window managers can be run on their own without runnung a desktop environment such as XFCE or LXDE. Mint's flagship is the Cinnamon desktop, and that's where Mint seems to focus its greatest effort. As the bookworm release nears, I am looking to try other desktop environments. LXQt doesn't yet have all applications, so they borrow some from LXDE, meaning that you'll Xfce. KDE vs. LXDE was created for the same reason for XFCE. LXDE has been optimized for many years and I don't think there's been any major new advances in this kind of low-level software technology that LXQt could now take advantage of. Arguably LXDE is the easiest of all DEs to tweak as all its settings are in text files. LXDE uses GTK2 which is deprecated, yes it's light, but also being GTK2 its old & can't take advantage of newer features such as HiDPI/2K/4K etc. However, I'd spend $50-60 and replace 2GB RAM with 8GB. I've been wanting to play with Solus but have no reason to switch at the moment. ago. For both lxde and xfce I suggest you to add Compton as compositor:it is better than the xfce one and fixes video tearing - lxde has no compositor. XFCE is a bit more customizable, LXDE is lighter, I think. It includes an application launcher (start menu), the desktop and the desktop panel (often referred to simply as the task bar). And, I theme it and set it up the way I want, not how anyone else thinks it should be. MX Linux. XFCE has always been solid. I personally recommend Linux Mint Debian Xfce for the "out of the box" as opposed to Xubuntu, which is slow as hell reasons unexplained, though it's faster than plain Ubuntu. You can make suggestions other than these two. Get it here. My favorite of the three Mint Flavors is XFCE, but I'm interested in trying something a little lighter, out of both curiosity and interest in finding as many backups as I can. If it is an old laptop, maybe XFCE is better. No, it's that most other desktop environments, including Windows, are insanely slow and have a ridiculous number of layers and junk going on during basic operations. GNOME vs. Just want to clarify something real quick. Emacs was made by GNU to have a robust text editor ( Far more robust than Vi at the time) Vi was a closed source component of Unix. Welcome to /r/Linux! This is a community for sharing news about Linux, interesting… EndeavourOS vs Fedora (Xfce DE) I'm on the Fedora Xfce right now. Se siente como un sistema mejor pensado en el que todo se integra perfectamente. I found both to be stable, appart from PCManFM I had some trouble with at time (things may have changed). Not a huge issue if you have 3GB RAM. Basic install of Xfce and I pull my applications from Flathub. XFCE is more compact and less robust than most other desktop environments such as Cinnamon. Xfce desktop: A popular lightweight desktop environment. Anyway, I updated the info in my internal database (brain) and added to mental RAM (can lose it at any moment) -- LOL! Currently PCLOS Openbox on one laptop, have to update hardware on the D630, it appears, but has Salix64 xfce on it at the moment. Jul 6, 2023 · The Linux distros that use XFCE as the default desktop include Xubuntu, Manjaro, etc. 5GB. However, MATE is also less customizable than Xfce. The others I don't have an opinion on. With 8 gb of ram I would not worry about the extra 50 mb used with xfce or 100+ mb used with mate or kde over lxde or lxqt, it will seriously be inconsequential. The nice thing about crouton is you can easily make and delete chroots. It really depends if you really want customization or just want a desktop that is clean. MATE has a faster compositor (less lag when dragging windows, good enough vsync) in my experience. Full network wifi speed, automatically shows my shared Windows 11 folder with no configuration needed, movies play fine. 2-libxfce4ui-2. But if I did want all the bells and whistles that Plasma 5 offers I would be okay using it on my laptop. Not compared to lxde. Dec 9, 2022 · LXDE vs. Introducing XFCE. XFCE and whatever ships with LXDE really are crap. Also (at least on the Arch repo with everything included) the Xfce package is 41mibs vs Lxqt's 23 mibs. Running on a lighter OS does help. I prefer Xfce because of my old PC. Lxqt is a lot of different pieces put together. 5800X3D, Zen 3 or Manjaro is a GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch. I See Gnome 42, Gnome 3, Gnome 2, Becoming Gnome and 2 DE's with an X in there name. And, if that's running too slowly, then try the even less resource intensive Lubuntu. 11 even uses slightly less memory than XFCE (with gtk+ 2). Fuck, I give up. LXDE is my favourite. LXDE and Xfce both have fairly lightweight WMs and applications. I would say XFCE is more stable, KDE has a lot more moving parts which tend to be subject to large scale change. Xfce if you want hardcore simplicity and modularity, Budgie if you want something a bit more cohesive and pretty imo. From my testing, XFCE uses about 430MB and Cinnamon uses about 700MB. Add your thoughts and get the conversation going. Cache 2 MB. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Plasma is the default desktop interface for KDE. If yes, it perfectly runs Debian stable with firmware-amd-graphics, firmware-realtek and firmware-atheros from non-free repo and an udev rule to disable autosuspend of ar3011 / 3012 BT USB built-in dongle. MATE desktop: A traditional looking desktop resembling the GNOME 2 era. I haven't tested XFCE long enough to see if it freezes like Cinnamon but it does seem more snappy. KDE full. Get app . 5. Debian is very vanilla, I like vanilla. That Beast isn't fast anyway. Processor Manufacturer Intel. Okay not all, only libxfce4panel is older one. ii gir1. This goes double if you don't use KDE apps much. A DE is really just a combination of a WM and some applications (e. • 3 yr. XFCE: 448 MB Memory used. Should see improvements over heavier OS's. 3. It is about tastes and preferences XFCE is rock solid and full of themes, budgie is cool and stylish. ) Ah, the old 'integration VS modularity' problem. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. 1. Nobody's responded to this post yet. Xfce is a lightweight 2D desktop environment designed for better performance on We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. Of course, with using the Ubuntu packages, the upstream KDE Software Compilation packages may vary a bit from these numbers. An example of this is the Window Manager – Openbox is the default, but you can choose from many others to suit your wants and needs. Both LXQT and LXDE sound nice, and (despite not being official Mint flavors) should be accessible from the Mint Software Manager. Welcome to the vibrant community dedicated to all things Linux! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast…. I have been a happy KDE user since I installed Arch, but then wanted to get the most out of my battery as it was decayed (15% Apr 21, 2023 · Xfce. Mar 8, 2010 · Eating much more memory than the lightweight Xfce/LXDE desktops was KDE 4. Apr 27, 2021 · LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that's only one part of the story. If I may, give a spin to Ubuntu Mate to test a very well refined Mate. LXQt: 391 MB Memory used. LXDE is incredibly simple and minimal, and for users looking for a DE that’s light and stays out of your way, LXDE is a great choice. XFCE is lighter and much more modular. It features a modern and intuitive user interface similar to traditional desktop environments, making it an excellent choice for users new to Linux. Also once you get into KDE, you can make it look BEAUTIFUL, just Actually I used Lxqt because I found it to be faster than Xfce, I based this of online data comparing the two and Xfce vs Lxqt's predicessor: Lxde ( which is probably lighter than Lxqt). Choose your favourite desktop environment in terms of polish and stability. Or install xfce and kde apps, you can fully use kde apps in xfce. 0:amd64 4. r/LinuxOnThinkpad A chip A close button. Then, open an “xterm” window and get the result of `free -mh` command. Switching over to XFCE. Take an Ubuntu minimal install and install xfce. EndeavourOS seemed faster to me. Dec 23, 2022 · Aquí es donde realmente empiezo a ver las diferencias entre estos dos sistemas. chickenandliver. 2K subscribers in the GNULinuxEsp community. IDK about other Linux users, but I find it absolutely INFURIATING when I find a nice GNOME app that doesn't work in KDE. Lubuntu, Xubuntu, Linux Lite, or Tiny Core. Yes, it is a xorg, not wayland. IRC web client: https://kiwiirc. There's also LXDE on the light side and Gnome3 on the heavier side. LXDE is very modular, not sure about XFCE though. Lubuntu is a distro that uses LXDE. lxqt is definitely faster and more lightweight but not as customizable. Mate and Xfce are both highly customizable desktop environments. Mate is better in that regard, but I find KDE uses less ram on boot than either and feels faster to me. XFCE is faster than all three but I don't like the look and feel. XFCE is light, Unity is heavy, KDE is closer to Unity I think. And the GUI is no slower than XFCE. css file or - Open a terminal window and type: nano ~/. So I run another apt-get install Gnome hoping to repair it -result: it messes up Trinity. Some people cite LXDE's use of discrete parts as one of its main trumps. Make your modifications - save and finally restart the panel: xfce4-panel -r. (even the window manager was/is third party in LXDE. Of course you can install both in arch and switch between them. You might want to look at wikipedia's list of light-weight Linux distribution, specifically the window/desktop manager column. Processor Type Core 2 Duo. For example if you have bluetooth headphones or speakers and such, GNOME makes it easier to manage in the gui rather than having to manage via the cli on lxde if I recall correctly. XFCE is a tad lighter than MATE and can be customized and themed to look like any desktop. Solid base, new apps. And, Lubuntu, likewise, is somewhat lighter on resources than Xfce. g. it started back in the 90's as an open source clone of Common Desktop Environment (CDE), a very popular but closed source DE for UNIX systems. En un arranque nuevo, el uso de la CPU es el mismo, alrededor del 1 por ciento, pero LXDE usa una memoria RAM de 219 MB, mientras que XFCE usa 465 MB de RAM. 1. Mar 10, 2021 · Briefly, the available choices are the following: Cinnamon desktop: A modern touch on traditional desktop. (I had written that comment after upgrading and confirming on my system). Afterward Gnome was messed up. LXDE uses the openbox window manager and XFCE has its own windows manager. Fortunately it's not that hard to replace defaults. I use it on my desktop where I'm happy with its performance. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. Here a good how to for pimping up xfce - it is based on 13. XFCE uses fewer daemons, thus fewer system resources such as memory and machine cycles. Archived post. Xfce is one of the oldest desktop environments out there that is still rocking. The memory difference matters more on older computers which have less than 2GB of RAM. I prefer Budgie, but Xfce is more customisable, so it may be a better option if that's what you're looking for. XFCE and KDE are both very lightweight, but with KDE it is a lot more Customizable and aims to be lightweight and fast while XFCE doesn't have as much customizable options but still is fast. cp rv kp xf ry pv bc jx sp om

Search

CLOSE